EASA: Regulation (EU) 2026/100 — Airworthiness Review and ARC Rules Modernised -APPLICABLE FROM AUGUST 7, 2026

Amends Commission Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014 (continuing airworthiness) · entered into force February 8, 2026 · applies from August 7, 2026 (per EASA’s weekly regulatory review) · scope: EASA Member States

Quick Answers

What changed for the airworthiness review? 

The rules on the airworthiness review and the Airworthiness Review Certificate (ARC) under Part-M (Annex I to Regulation (EU) 1321/2014) are rewritten: an ARC remains valid for 1 year with up to two consecutive 1-year extensions; the review may now be performed up to 90 days before ARC expiry without breaking the review-pattern continuity; the review itself may not be subcontracted; and a copy of any ARC issued or extended must reach the Member State of registry within 10 days.

Who is affected? 

CAMOs and CAOs performing airworthiness reviews (Annex Vc Part-CAMO and Annex Vd Part-CAO scopes), owners/operators under Part-M and Part-ML, airworthiness review staff, and competent authorities — across all EASA Member State aircraft.

Is this a new burden? 

Mostly, no — it is a modernization that clarifies and stabilizes long-practiced review patterns (e.g., the 90-day early-review window) and adds a formal intra-EU registration-transfer procedure (M.A.905).

Does it affect non-EU CAMOs? 

Yes, where they hold EASA approvals (Part-145 organizations, CAMOs of EU-registered aircraft) and perform airworthiness reviews within an EASA approval scope.

Quick Compliance Summary

FieldDetail
Regulatory bodyEuropean Union — amending Regulation (EU) 2026/100 of the Commission; implemented by EASA Members
InstrumentCommission Regulation (EU) 2026/100 — amends Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014 (continuing airworthiness)
StatusApplicable August 7, 2026 (entered into force February 8, 2026)
Key amendmentsReplaces points M.A.901–M.A.905 (airworthiness review general rules, ARC validity, review process, review staff, registration transfer) and associated parts
ARC validity1 year; extendable twice, each for 1 year; continuity rules for extension timing
Early review windowReview may be carried out ≤90 days before ARC expiry with no loss of pattern continuity
ProhibitionsAirworthiness review may not be subcontracted; ARC must not be issued where there is evidence the aircraft is not airworthy
ReportingARC copy to the Member State of registry within 10 days of issue/extension
Light GA provisionFor aircraft ≤2,730 kg MTOM, the competent authority may carry out the review and issue the ARC at the owner’s request
EnforcementAn aircraft may not fly with an invalid ARC or where continuing airworthiness does not meet the regulation

Who Should Read This

  • CAMO managers and airworthiness review staff (AR staff) — revised M.A.901–905 process and signatures
  • Continuing Airworthiness Organizations (CAO) under Part-CAO — scope of review authority per CAO.A.095(c)(1)
  • Owners and operators of EU-registered aircraft (Part-M / Part-ML) — ARC extension timing and the ≤2,730 kg authority-review option
  • Owners buying/selling EU-registered aircraft — new intra-EU registration-transfer continuity procedure
  • EASA-approved Part-145 and CAMO training providers — update of procedures, exposition and examiner material
  • Non-EU organizations with EU-registered aircraft in their fleet — review-planning windows change

At a Glance

ItemDetail
Base regulationCommission Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014 (continuing airworthiness)
Annexes referencedAnnex I (Part-M), Annex Vc (Part-CAMO), Annex Vd (Part-CAO); airworthiness certificates per Regulation (EU) No 748/2012 (Part 21 / Part 21 Light)
ARC validity1 year + max two consecutive 1-year extensions
Extension start datePrevious expiry date if carried out ≤30 days before/after expiry; otherwise the extension date
Review performanceDocumented review of continuing airworthiness records + physical survey; not subcontracted
≤2,730 kg MTOM optionCompetent authority may review and issue ARC at the owner’s request
ARC copy to authorityWithin 10 days of issue or extension

What This Does

Regulation (EU) 2026/100 rewrites the core Part-M provisions governing the airworthiness review so that the certificate’s life-cycle is explicit and predictable: validity — an ARC is valid for 1 year and may be extended twice, each extension adding 1 year, with clear rules on when the extension clock starts; timing flexibility — the next review can be performed up to 90 days before expiry without breaking the continuity of the review pattern; integrity — the review cannot be subcontracted, and an ARC cannot be issued where there is evidence the aircraft is not airworthy; traceability — a copy of every issued or extended ARC goes to the registry authority within 10 days; and mobility — a new procedure (M.A.905) covers transfer of aircraft registration within the Union, preserving ARC continuity through the transfer.

Organizations approved under Part-CAMO (CAMO.A.125(e)) or Part-CAO (CAO.A.095(c)(1)) may continue to perform reviews within their scope; AR staff who carried out the review must sign the ARC or recommendation.

What it does NOT do

  • It does not create new inspection intervals for the aircraft itself — the maintenance program rules are unchanged.
  • It does not change ARC validity for Part-ML aircraft differently from Part-M — validity logic applies consistently.
  • It does not authorize CAMOs to outsource the review function — subcontracting is expressly prohibited.

Why This Exists Now

The change is part of the EU’s continuing-airworthiness simplification agenda. Experience with the airworthiness review since the original 1321/2014 framework showed operators and authorities needed: a stable, predictable ARC extension pattern (the two-extension rule), clarity that reviews close to expiry do not reset the pattern, a formal route for intra-EU registration transfers (which had previously been handled inconsistently between Member States), and sharper rules on who may perform and sign reviews.

The regulation entered into force on 8 February 2026 and — as reported in EASA’s weekly regulatory review (Week 34, 17–23 August 2026) — became applicable on 7 August 2026.

Operational Impact Matrix

Affected functionAction requiredDeadline / driverReference
CAMO (Annex Vc)Update exposition/procedures for M.A.901–905; confirm review-scope approvals (CAMO.A.125(e)); update AR-staff signing arrangementsApplicable from Aug 7, 2026Part-CAMO; M.A.901(d)
CAO (Annex Vd)Confirm review authority per CAO.A.095(c)(1) and align proceduresApplicable from Aug 7, 2026Part-CAO
AR staffUpdate review checklists to the new M.A.903 process; document physical survey + records reviewNext review after Aug 7, 2026M.A.903
Owners (<2,730 kg)Be aware of the option to request authority-performed review; ARC copy flows to registry within 10 daysOngoingM.A.901(j)
Fleet sales / registration transfersUse the M.A.905 transfer procedure to preserve ARC continuity during intra-EU transfersAt each transferM.A.905
Competent authoritiesAccept ARC copies within 10 days; handle authority reviews for ≤2,730 kg aircraftFrom Aug 7, 2026M.A.901(j), M.A.901(i)

Compliance Checklist

  • Procedures/exposition updated to M.A.901–M.A.905 revisions
  • ARC tracking shows 1-year validity and the one-or-two-extension logic per aircraft
  • Review planning uses the ≤90-day early window without resetting the pattern
  • Subcontracting of the airworthiness review confirmed absent from all provider arrangements
  • AR-staff signature rules aligned with M.A.901(d)
  • 10-day transmission of issued/extended ARC copies to registry implemented
  • Intra-EU registration-transfer checklist implemented per M.A.905
  • For ≤2,730 kg aircraft: owner advisory on authority-review option published/communicated

ARW take: this is a low-risk modernization, but the 90-day early-window and the two-extension rule are exactly the clauses that generate audit findings when staff are unaware of them.

The most practical impact is on fleet transfers: buyers and sellers of EU-registered aircraft should build the M.A.905 continuity step into the technical handover checklist now, rather than discovering the requirement mid-transfer.

Watch for the corresponding Easy Access Rules revision, which EASA historically publishes shortly after application.

Key Dates

MilestoneDate
Regulation (EU) 2026/100 entered into forceFebruary 8, 2026
Application dateAugust 7, 2026
EASA Easy Access Rules updateWatch item — follow EASA publications

Source Documents

FAQ

I perform the review 75 days before the ARC expires and the aircraft is released with a big shortfall — is the pattern lost? 

No. A review conducted within ≤90 days of expiry does not break the continuity of the review pattern (M.A.901(f)).

Can a CAMO hand the review to a subcontracted organization? 

No. The airworthiness review may not be subcontracted (M.A.901(g)).

How long is my ARC valid, and can I extend it? 

1 year, plus up to two consecutive 1-year extensions, subject to the conditions in M.A.902.

We operate light aircraft (≤2,730 kg MTOM). What’s new for us? 

On request, the competent authority may carry out the review and issue the ARC itself (M.A.901(j)); the extension conditions in M.A.902(b) also apply to your maintenance release path.

Does this apply to UK-registered aircraft? 

No. The UK left the EASA system; UK CAA rules under UK Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014 follow their own amendment path.

Related Reading

© 2026 Aviation Reg Watch. This article is an informational summary compiled from the sources listed above, not legal or airworthiness advice. Verify against the primary source (EUR-Lex full text) before making compliance decisions. Consult your CAMO, competent authority, or legal counsel for fleet-specific actions.

About the Author
Raju KP  ·  Founder & Principal Analyst, Aviation Reg Watch

Raju founded Aviation Reg Watch, an independent publication covering aviation regulation, airline policy, airport governance, safety oversight and industry developments. His goal is to explain complex aviation regulations and policy changes in a clear, balanced, and practical way for aviation professionals, investors, and informed readers.

He brings more than 30 years of professional experience across banking, financial journalism, and management consulting. During more than nine years with a Big Four global advisory firm, he supported aviation-sector clients on research and consulting assignments involving airlines, airports, and aviation policy. Earlier in his career, he worked as a financial journalist covering macroeconomic data, financial markets, and policy developments.