FAA AD 2026-13-10: Boeing 747-8 and 777 Family — 5G Interference May Affect Pitch Control and Tail Strike Protection

Quick Reading

What is unique about the 5G failure mode for Boeing 747-8 and 777 aircraft?

Unlike other Boeing 5G ADs focused on landing distance or automation workload, FAA AD 2026-13-10 identifies that 5G Lower C-Band interference on the 747-8 and 777 may affect pitch control laws — including tail strike protection — that depend on radio altimeter data, regardless of approach type or weather.

Does FAA AD 2026-13-10 apply to the Boeing 777X?

No. FAA AD 2026-13-10 applies to the 747-8, 747-8F, 777-200, 777-200LR, 777-300, 777-300ER, and 777F. The 777X is not listed as applicable to this AD.

Quick Compliance Summary

Regulatory bodyFederal Aviation Administration (FAA)
AD number2026-13-10 — Amendment 39-23393
DocketFAA-2026-7202
Aircraft affectedAll Boeing 747-8, 747-8F, 777-200, 777-200LR, 777-300, 777-300ER, and 777F
Issue5G Lower C-Band interference may affect pitch control laws — including tail strike protection — when operating in Canadian airspace
Required actionAFM revision incorporating radio altimeter limitations
Compliance deadlineJuly 1, 2026 — already effective
Who must actOperators, Directors of Operations, CAMOs, Flight Standards teams for 747-8 and 777 fleets
SourceFederal Register Vol. 91, No. 125, June 30, 2026 — FR Doc 2026-13216

Who Should Read This

This is the fifth type-specific 5G AD in a series published June 30, 2026. It covers the Boeing 747-8/-8F and 777 family — with failure modes distinct from those in the other 5G ADs.

Directly relevant to:

  • Directors of Operations for airlines with 747-8 or 777 Canadian operations
  • Directors of Maintenance responsible for AFM currency on these types
  • Continuing Airworthiness Managers (CAMs)
  • Flight Operations and Standards departments
  • Crew Training and Standards teams
  • Dispatch and Operational Control departments

At a Glance

ItemDetails
AD Number2026-13-10
Amendment39-23393
DocketFAA-2026-7202
ATA Code34 — Navigation
Aircraft747-8, 747-8F, 777-200, 777-200LR, 777-300, 777-300ER, 777F
Effective DateJuly 1, 2026
Required ActionAFM Limitations revision
Unique failure mode5G interference may affect pitch control laws — including tail strike protection — regardless of approach type or weather
Terminating actionUpgrade to radio altimeter-tolerant airplane
Comment deadlineAugust 14, 2026

What Changed

The FAA published AD 2026-13-10 on June 30, 2026. It became effective July 1, 2026.

The root cause is identical to all other 5G ADs in this series. Transport Canada notified the FAA in late March 2026 that 5G Lower C-Band airport protection mitigations would be removed from July 1, 2026. Only radio altimeter-tolerant airplanes are adequately protected after that date.

This AD covers the Boeing 747-8, 747-8F, and the full 777 family.

Why It Matters — A Distinct and Serious Failure Mode

The 747-8 and 777 5G failure modes are different from those of the other type-specific ADs in this series. It is the most safety-significant.

For the 737 MAX and 787 families, the risk centered on landing distance — thrust reverser deployment, speedbrake deployment, and AIR/GROUND mode transitions.

For the 737 Classic and NG, the risk was increased flightcrew workload on approach with automation engaged.

For the 747-8 and 777, the FAA identifies a different risk. 5G interference may affect multiple airplane systems using radio altimeter data. Critically, this includes the pitch control laws, including those that provide tail-strike protection.

Tail strike protection on these aircraft is a fly-by-wire control law function. It limits nose-up pitch attitude near the runway surface during rotation and landing to prevent the tail from striking the ground. It depends on radio altimeter data to determine proximity to the runway.

If 5G interference disrupts radio altimeter data, the tail strike protection law may not function correctly. This risk applies regardless of the approach type or weather conditions.

This is not a landing distance concern. It is a flight control law concern at a critical phase of flight.

Who Is Affected

All Boeing 747-8, 747-8F, 777-200, 777-200LR, 777-300, 777-300ER, and 777F airplanes, certificated in any category, are in scope.

There are no variant exceptions within the 747-8 or 777 families.

The 777X family is not included in this AD. The 747-8 is still in active service with both passenger and freighter operators. The 777 family is one of the most widely operated wide-body types in the world — particularly the 777-300ER on long-haul routes that include Canada.

Required Action

Revise the Airplane Flight Manual to incorporate limitations prohibiting certain operations requiring radio altimeter data when operating in Canadian airspace.

Obtain the applicable AFM revision from Boeing or your type certificate holder immediately.

Brief all crews operating to Canada. Update dispatch procedures for Canadian routes.

Terminating action is available. Modifying the airplane from a non-radio-altimeter-tolerant airplane to a radio-altimeter-tolerant airplane terminates the AFM limitations for that airplane. After modification, the limitations may be removed from the AFM.

5G AD Series — Cross-Reference

This AD is one of six type-specific 5G ADs published alongside the general transport category directive.

ADAircraftUnique failure mode
2026-13-02All transport/commuter categoryGeneral limitation
2026-13-MAX737-8, 737-9, 737-8200Thrust reverser/spoiler/idle thrust
2026-13-13737 Classic/NG (-100 to -900ER)Autoflight workload increase
2026-13-11787-8, 787-9, 787-10AIR/GROUND transition + landing distance
2026-13-10747-8, 747-8F, 777 familyPitch control laws / tail strike protection
2026-13-15Legacy Boeing/MD fleetAutoflight workload increase

Key Dates

EventDate
Transport Canada notifies FAALate March 2026
AD 2026-13-10 publishedJune 30, 2026
AD effective / Canadian 5G protections removedJuly 1, 2026
Comment deadlineAugust 14, 2026

Source Documents

FAQ

Is the tail strike protection risk specific to the 747-8 and 777?

Yes. This specific failure mode — 5G interference affecting pitch control laws including tail strike protection — is identified in this AD for the 747-8 and 777 family. It does not appear in the other type-specific 5G ADs.

Does this AD apply to the 777X?

No. The 777X is not listed in the applicability of AD 2026-13-10.

What is tail strike protection and why does radio altimeter data matter?

Tail strike protection is a fly-by-wire control law that limits nose-up pitch attitude close to the runway to prevent the tail from contacting the ground during rotation and landing. It relies on radio altimeter data to determine runway proximity. If that data is degraded by 5G interference, the protection may not function as designed.

Is a terminating action available?

Yes. Modifying the airplane to a radio altimeter-tolerant airplane terminates the AFM limitations. Once completed, the limitations can be removed from the AFM.

This AD is already past its effective date — what should operators do?

Complete the AFM revision immediately. Operating an affected aircraft into Canadian airspace without the revision constitutes a violation of 14 CFR 39.7.

Related Reading


aviationregwatch.com publishes regulatory intelligence for aviation compliance professionals. This article is an informational summary, not legal or airworthiness advice. Consult your aircraft manufacturer, type certificate holder, or legal counsel for compliance decisions.

About the Author
Raju KP  ·  Founder & Principal Analyst, Aviation Reg Watch

Raju founded Aviation Reg Watch, an independent publication covering aviation regulation, airline policy, airport governance, safety oversight and industry developments. His goal is to explain complex aviation regulations and policy changes in a clear, balanced, and practical way for aviation professionals, investors, and informed readers.

He brings more than 30 years of professional experience across banking, financial journalism, and management consulting. During more than nine years with a Big Four global advisory firm, he supported aviation-sector clients on research and consulting assignments involving airlines, airports, and aviation policy. Earlier in his career, he worked as a financial journalist covering macroeconomic data, financial markets, and policy developments.