FAA AD 2026-13-15: 5G Canadian Airspace Limitations Now Cover Boeing 707, 717, 727, DC-8, DC-9, DC-10, MD-11, and MD-80/90 Series

Quick Reading

Which legacy Boeing and McDonnell Douglas aircraft are covered by FAA AD 2026-13-15?

FAA AD 2026-13-15, effective July 1, 2026, covers Boeing 707, 717, 727, DC-8, DC-9, DC-10, MD-11, and MD-80/87/88/90-30 series aircraft. It requires AFM Limitations revisions for most variants, with MD-81, MD-82, MD-83, MD-87, MD-88, and MD-90-30 also requiring an AFM Operating Procedures revision.

Do operators of legacy Boeing aircraft that don’t fly to Canada need to comply with AD 2026-13-15?

No. The FAA stated that airplanes that do not operate in Canadian airspace will not have to comply and will have no costs under AD 2026-13-15. The AFM revision requirement applies only to aircraft that operate in Canadian airspace.

Quick Compliance Summary

Regulatory bodyFederal Aviation Administration (FAA)
AD number2026-13-15 — Amendment 39-23398
DocketFAA-2026-7206
Aircraft affectedBoeing 707, 717, 727, DC-8, DC-9 (except certain MD variants noted below), DC-10, MD-11, MD-80, MD-87, MD-88, MD-90-30
Issue5G Lower C-Band interference in Canadian airspace causes increased flightcrew workload on approach with flight director, autothrottle, or autopilot engaged
Required actionAFM Limitations revision. MD-81, MD-82, MD-83, MD-87, MD-88, MD-90-30 also require an AFM Operating Procedures revision
Compliance deadlineJuly 1, 2026 — already effective
Terminating actionAvailable — upgrade to radio altimeter tolerant airplane
SourceFederal Register Vol. 91, No. 125, June 30, 2026 — FR Doc 2026-13205

Who Should Read This

Directly relevant to:

  • Directors of Operations for freighter, charter, and cargo operators still flying these legacy types
  • Continuing Airworthiness Managers (CAMs)
  • Directors of Maintenance responsible for AFM currency on legacy Boeing and McDonnell Douglas types
  • Part 145 MRO organisations maintaining these aircraft
  • Lessors with legacy fleet assets operating into Canada

This is the sixth and most broadly-scoped type-specific 5G AD. It covers a large range of legacy Boeing and McDonnell Douglas aircraft types.

At a Glance

ItemDetails
AD Number2026-13-15
Amendment39-23398
DocketFAA-2026-7206
ATA Code34 — Navigation
Effective DateJuly 1, 2026
Required Action (most variants)AFM Limitations revision
Required Action (MD-81/-82/-83/-87/-88/MD-90-30)AFM Limitations revision + AFM Operating Procedures revision
Failure modeIncreased flightcrew workload on approach with autoflight systems engaged
Terminating actionAvailable — radio altimeter tolerant upgrade
Comment deadlineAugust 14, 2026

What Changed

The FAA published AD 2026-13-15 on June 30, 2026. It became effective July 1, 2026.

The root cause is the same as all other 5G ADs in this series. Canadian 5G Lower C-Band airport protection mitigations were removed from July 1, 2026, leaving non-radio-altimeter-tolerant airplanes vulnerable to interference that disrupts radio altimeter data.

This AD is notable for the breadth of its applicability. It covers nine aircraft families across two manufacturers — Boeing and McDonnell Douglas — spanning decades of commercial aviation history.

Why It Matters

The failure mode in this AD mirrors the 737 Classic and NG directive. When 5G interference degrades radio altimeter data on approach, certain autopilot, autothrottle, and flight director functions may not perform correctly.

The consequence is increased flightcrew workload at the most demanding phase of flight. A crew managing unexpected autoflight degradation on approach has fewer resources to manage other tasks simultaneously. This could lead to a reduced ability to maintain safe flight and landing.

For legacy types, this matters in a specific operational context. Many 707, 727, DC-8, DC-9, DC-10, and MD-series aircraft in active service today are operated by cargo, charter, or training operators. These operators often have smaller crew training departments and less frequent recurrent simulator training than major airlines. The crew workload risk in this AD deserves particular attention in those environments.

Aircraft Covered

The AD applicability is broad. Confirm your specific model and series against the AD text.

FamilyVariants covered
Boeing 707-100 Long Body, -200, -100B Long Body, -100B Short Body, -300, -300B, -300C, -400
Boeing 717-200
Boeing 727727, 727C, -100, -100C, -200, -200F
Douglas DC-8DC-8-11 through DC-8-73F series
Douglas DC-9DC-9-11 through DC-9-51 (excluding DC-9-81/82/83/87 — see MD series below)
Douglas DC-10All series
McDonnell Douglas MD-11MD-11 and MD-11F
McDonnell Douglas MD-80/90DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD-83), DC-9-87 (MD-87), MD-88, MD-90-30

Required Action — Note the Two-Tier Requirement

Most aircraft in scope require only an AFM Limitations revision — the same single-section revision required for the 737 Classic/NG AD.

However, the MD-81, MD-82, MD-83, MD-87, MD-88, and MD-90-30 require both an AFM Limitations revision and an AFM Operating Procedures revision.

This mirrors the 787 AD approach. The Operating Procedures revision provides specific procedures for the flightcrew to follow in Canadian airspace when operating under the limitations.

If you operate MD-80 or MD-90 series aircraft, confirm that both AFM sections are revised before dispatch to Canada.

Terminating action: Modifying any affected airplane to a radio altimeter tolerant airplane terminates all limitations and operating procedures for that airplane. After modification, the relevant AFM sections may be removed.

Operational Impact

Most 707, 727, DC-8, and DC-9 series aircraft currently in service are operated by cargo, charter, or training organisations. The 5G AD applicability does not mean these operators are routinely flying to Canada.

Confirm which aircraft in your fleet actually operate Canadian routes. The AFM revision requirement applies only if the aircraft will operate in Canadian airspace. The FAA stated that airplanes that do not operate in Canada will not have costs under this AD.

For cargo and charter operators with Canadian operations, the AFM revision is the priority. For most MD-80 operators — particularly charter airlines operating in North America — Canadian routes are common. Confirm AFM currency across the fleet now.

5G AD Series — Where This Fits

ADAircraftFailure mode
2026-13-02All transport/commuter categoryGeneral limitation
2026-13-17 (MAX)737-8, 737-9, 737-8200Thrust reverser/spoiler/idle thrust
2026-13-13737 Classic/NG (-100 to -900ER)Autoflight workload increase
2026-13-11787-8, 787-9, 787-10AIR/GROUND transition + landing distance
2026-13-10747-8, 747-8F, 777 familyPitch control / tail strike protection
2026-13-15Legacy Boeing/MD fleetAutoflight workload increase

Key Dates

EventDate
Transport Canada notifies FAALate March 2026
AD 2026-13-15 publishedJune 30, 2026
AD effective / Canadian 5G protections removedJuly 1, 2026
Comment deadlineAugust 14, 2026

Source Documents

FAQ

Does this AD apply to aircraft that never fly to Canada?

No. The FAA stated that airplanes that do not operate in Canada will not have to comply and will have no costs under this AD.

Why do the MD-81/82/83/87/88 and MD-90 require two AFM revisions when the DC-9 variants only require one?

The MD-80 and MD-90 series have different autoflight system architectures from the earlier DC-9 variants. The Operating Procedures revision provides specific crew procedures for managing the autoflight limitations in Canadian airspace on those types.

Is a terminating action available?

Yes. Upgrading any affected airplane to radio altimeter tolerant status terminates all limitations and operating procedures for that airplane.

How many US-registered aircraft are covered?

The FAA’s cost analysis includes aircraft from nine families. Given the age of many variants, the active US-registered population is significantly smaller than the total certificated population. Operators should check current US registry status for their specific aircraft.

Is the DC-10 included?

Yes. All DC-10 series airplanes are in scope. Many remain in active cargo service.

Relaed Reading


aviationregwatch.com publishes regulatory intelligence for aviation compliance professionals. This article is an informational summary, not legal or airworthiness advice. Consult your aircraft manufacturer, type certificate holder, or legal counsel for compliance decisions.

About the Author
Raju KP  ·  Founder & Principal Analyst, Aviation Reg Watch

Raju founded Aviation Reg Watch, an independent publication covering aviation regulation, airline policy, airport governance, safety oversight and industry developments. His goal is to explain complex aviation regulations and policy changes in a clear, balanced, and practical way for aviation professionals, investors, and informed readers.

He brings more than 30 years of professional experience across banking, financial journalism, and management consulting. During more than nine years with a Big Four global advisory firm, he supported aviation-sector clients on research and consulting assignments involving airlines, airports, and aviation policy. Earlier in his career, he worked as a financial journalist covering macroeconomic data, financial markets, and policy developments.